In this assignment, my group was tasked with creating a vehicle that could travel 10km on a certain planet. Our group was given the planet Enceladus. This planet is mainly made up of ice and snow on the surface. Our group decided that trying to create traction on these difficult surfaces would be very complicated. Enceladus has water at 40km under the surface. We decided that it would be an interesting challenge to try to create a submarine that could travel the distance underwater. The definition statement that my group came up with is “The 4 astronauts operating the vehicle need to be able to operate and traverse in cold underwater temperatures of -201.67 celsius, uneven terrain, keep stable in high pressure conditions, and stay energy efficient so the vehicle is able to travel at least 10 km at one filling of energy while not leaving a detrimental impact on the planet for future missions.”
The test we decided to conduct was a simple underwater propulsion test. We connected a fishing buoy to the submarine to track where it was underwater. This buoy would allow us to capture efficiency with a still camera that wouldn’t have to be underwater to track the submarine. We hoped to learn if our submarine would be able to propel itself without floating. We had weights on stand-by in case the submarine floated.
Our final solution included a section of the submarine that allowed water to flow in. This way, we didn’t have to worry about buoyancy. Our first test proved unsuccessful with our old submarine. the submarine was too light to sink so it would float on the surface. It did however stay watertight which was a bonus.

We also built a separate section for all electronics. This section would be more watertight than the others because safety was our top priority. We had problems with overcoming friction with our engine so we decided to get a new motor. This motor has a higher torque so it would theoretically overcome the force of the friction. We also purchased lower friction tape to help with this problem.

This shows the device we used to hold our magnets. This would connect with the motor on the inside, removing the problem of water getting near the engine. There would be a similar part on the outside of the submarine with the same magnets. We struggled with holding the motor in place so we designed a part to hold it in place. This removed the added worry of the engine falling out and not receiving any power. This also changed the worry of having the motor on an angle and the submarine driving on a weird angle.

Everything written up to here was completed before testing our project.
When my group went to test our submarine, we could not the get internal engine to connect to the external engine. The force of the engine was too powerful for the magnets we had attached to connect and spin. Because we could not get the magnets to connect, we could not create any propulsion for our submarine. We did conduct a buoyancy test. Sadly, our submarine was still slightly buoyant and we needed to attach counterweights for it to sink. Another problem that occurred was the inside of our submarine, where the electronics were housed, proved to not be watertight. We had tried to watertight the inside of the casing but it proved unsuccessful. Since we had tried to create an area in the submarine where water could flow freely, therefore allowing the submarine to sink, we had to decrease the thickness of the inner walls. This slight change, and not being able to watertight the bottom of the inner casing, proved to be a large problem. The electronics on the inside we quickly doused in water because the inner wall was too thin. Since the engine could not create any propulsion, we were not able to calculate efficiency. Therefore, our submarine had an efficiency of 0%. We were planning on filming our test, but because our submarine had zero propulsion, there was no test to film. Our group calculated an estimated energy intake of 130-180J. We assumed the submarine was moving at 1 m/s and had 1 amps of current flowing through our circuit. We also assumed our submarine would have a realistic efficiency of 15%. We also calculated how much energy would be required to travel one metre with the current assumptions made. This ended up being around 9 J per metre. This estimated efficiency would have been considered a massive success. We had a powerful enough engine for these speeds but we would have needed to have certain factors go our way to achieve this high speed of propulsion.
Conclusion
For the next time I build a submarine, there were a few key takeaways that I would try to improve. To start, I would make sure that anything going underwater is properly sealed. A problem our group encountered was not having the inner compartment water tight. This proved to be a fatal problem and was definitely a key takeaway. Another problem my group ran into was access to the electronics. We wanted to have the top part of the submarine sealed, so we had to seal it with watertight tape. The problem with this was we immediately lost access to our electronics before we could attach the outer engine. We also tried to overcome the problem of our submarine turning into a boat. We did not have enough weight in the submarine, so it would float. We tried to come up with a solution, but the material we were using was simply too lightweight. In the end we had to attach counterweights to optimize the underwater depth control. As mentioned previously, the material that we were using proved to be ineffective. It was too lightweight and could not resist water at the sizes we needed to store our electronics. The final problem that my group encountered was not having enough project ideas at the beginning. We had come up with a few simple ideas that would have proven to be ineffective. Due to the fact that we had so few ideas, we had to pick an idea that was more complicated, and ended up being the reason that our submarine could not create any propulsion.
Conclusion Part Two
Some of the problems that would have arisen if we had travelled to Enceladus in modern times would have proven to be fatal. To start, the submarine would have to be designed completely differently to account for the high amounts of pressure under the 40km of ice on our planet. We would have had to re-enforce the walls of the submarine with internal beams and find ways to create an internal system that kept oxygen flowing throughout the entire submarine. Another problem that would have arisen is the vast amounts of energy required to make the trip. We would have had to bring the fuel from earth which would have made the trip very difficult due to the extra weight. We also would have had to use most of the fuel getting to our planet, while still saving some for the return trip. As mentioned previously, Enceladus has ice for 40km before reaching water. To reach this depth would have been a very difficult challenge while detrimentally impacting the planet for the upcoming future. There are no current machines that could drill the hole needed to allow the submarine to reach this depth while still carrying four passengers. Another problem that occurs with the depth issue, is retrieving supplies. Modern technology does not have the precision to drop the crucial supplies necessary to complete our mission in the hole that we previously (by a miracle) had been able to dig. We would have had to bring all of our supplies on the submarine which would have once again, increased the weight, making the trip to Enceladus, not evening mentioning the return trip back to earth incredibly difficult.
Overall, this project taught our group crucial team work and critical thinking skill required when designing a complicated project. Although our project ended up failing, we learned crucial lessons throughout the design process that will help us with any future projects similar to this.
I used no AI for any aspect of the process of building or testing our project. I felt like there was no need for AI throughout this project. I did have to research certain estimates for efficiency since our project did not work.





