PEP Part 2

PEP(Planetary Exploration Project) is a project to design a vehicle that will function on a exoplanet/exomoon of choice. We chose Titan(Saturn’s largest moon). We chose this because of many promising things about it that we could use to our advantage, like a subsurface ocean, abundance of methane and ethane, and the atmosphere shielding us from radiation. When designing a vehicle suitable for Titan, the critical problems we must consider are its ability to accommodate 4 people and its machinery under extreme temperatures of -180°C, hold sufficient energy to travel distances of 10km at a time, be able to produce oxygen, and have sufficient traction to grip Titan’s unique surface of ice, dunes and pebbles alongside combating the lower gravity similar to the moons(definition statement). We started with a rough sketch of the vehicle(very similar to the initial design). I then modeled its housing and we printed it as well as all the other parts required.

Our tests were mainly aimed at finding:

The effectiveness of our design(spike treads) on different terrains that tried to imitate Titan’s terrain;

Finding the efficiency of our vehicle, and seeing if our prototype, once scaled up could drive 10km.

Procedure

Our tests were intended to find efficiency and test the vehicle on surfaces mimicking Titan’s terrain. Our desert environment could be something like a large pillow, so that the surface is easily compressed under heavy enough weight, or it could be simply just sand. This is going to be great as a way to see how our treads will perform in Titan’s sand dunes. The surface ended up being a bed of kinetic sand.

These CAD designs shown below are the initial design of the housing/main body of our vehicle. This was based on a sketch Cooper made.

This picture below is the schematic of the initial design of the Arduino system of the vehicle.

Failing is part of the process when making something new like this. Our first failure was the housing. It was made unnecessarily complex and raised issues with balance. Another issue was that our wheels, which were supposed to have treads didn’t have any. We decided that we didn’t have time to redo the wheels and instead used a combination of tape and hot glue to emulate the treads. We also had issues with the wheels, since they couldn’t fit on the vehicle when we tried them on. This was during the first test day so unfortunately we did not test that day.

For our final solution, we scrapped the complex and unnecessary housing for a much simpler cuboid. We decided to expose the roof(although not practical on Titan) to allow us to easily access the space inside the vehicle, where everything would go. We also placed a small counterweight on one of the sides because we encountered balance issues. We also redesigned the wheels to be much simpler, with a rubber band around it.

Final Test

We tested 2 main things: the performance of the vehicle on sand and the performance of the vehicle on normal ground. We wanted to do another test for slippery surfaces but we did not end up doing that. Attached are the videos of the tests:

The tests went well and we expected the result. We were not going to use the sand test to measure efficiency, rather then flat surface test because of the sake of accuracy. Through video analysis we got output energy of the vehicle.

Analysis

The data we collected was mainly finding efficiency. Efficiency is calculated through this equation:

(in percent)

We chose to use the whiteboard test rather than the sand test just because the whiteboard test was smoother and easier to collect accurate data on. In order to find input energy we need to find the voltage and current of the vehicle, which we did with a multimeter. Our voltage is 7.34V. When trying to find our current, we got a response, but it came out as -0.00, and nothing happened on the other multimeter. We decided we would find current through finding the resistance, which was 14.05Ω. Since I = V/Ω, our current is:

and our input energy is

For our output energy, we used the video analysis lab. Here is the graph of the vehicle’s position over time, as well as the velocity:

Screenshot

Over the span of 2 seconds, the vehicle’s velocity was an average of 0.347m/s, with a standard deviation of ~0.098. Our vehicle weighs 506.7g, or 0.5067kg. Now that we have all the data necessary to find efficiency, we can calculate it as such:

This energy efficiency is surprisingly low. One reason might be the way we calculated the current. It would obviously be much more accurate if we were to measure the current itself, but with the issues we had with measuring current this was the best result we could get.

Conclusion

We can conclude from this project that it’s probably smarter to plan further ahead than we might’ve thought. We also should’ve documented things better and thought things through. Based on what we have learnt a few things I would do would be to:

  • Improve wheel design, specifically the treads and wheel size
  • Secure the circuit well(some wires started disconnecting during testing)
  • Invest in some better motors & power source because clearly our vehicle isn’t efficient
  • Make the vehicle more accurate to what we drafted

If we were to bring our design to Titan we would probably die. First of all, we didn’t do any type of insulation that we planned on doing. Second of all, the wheels were too poorly planned and I don’t think it would’ve moved much in deep sand dunes and ice. Third of all, we would run out of fuel before moving any meaningful distance, not to mention that we would have 4 people on the vehicle. We also could try to take advantage of the hydrocarbons on Titan but obviously it’s not easy to do in a Fusion lab.

AI Transcript

AI was used to try to find the current of our vehicle(we failed). Attached is the transcript:


Comments

5 Responses to “PEP Part 2”

  1. mcrompton Avatar
    mcrompton

    Good report, Trison. I like the fact you discussed the full process including failures. Can you answer one question for me? You mention reasons why you would “die” on Titan. Can you provide potential solutions to those problems? How might you deal with insulation? How would you improve the wheels? How much fuel do you think that you might have given the current design and how much would you need? How might you adjust to ensure that you had enough fuel? Please reply in the comments below.

  2. For insulation we could use some sort of silica aerogel. It is extremely light, which has better efficiency compared to a heavier insulator, and a great insulator, however it is expensive, and brittle. It is already used in some NASA missions. In order to improve the wheels I would improve the wheel size and the traction. If we had a bigger wheel, we would be able to traverse altitude easier(as seen in the test videos), and also theoretically would travel more because the weight difference probably isn’t huge between a slightly bigger wheel, and maybe a motor upgrade would fit that too. In order to improve traction I would move heavier parts lower to combat the low gravity on Titan. I would put spikes on the wheels, so that it works on both icy and sandy terrain. I would also make the wheels have more contact with the ground to increase friction.

  3. If we were to upscale the vehicle to fit 4 people the vehicle would probably be scaled up around 6 times, increasing volume by 216x. It might weigh probably somewhere around 300kg because of the other stuff we would need to add in order to make things functional. The total weight of the people + the vehicle might be somewhere around 300 + 4*70 =580kg total. We need to calculate our vehicle’s weight on Titan, which comes out to be 580*1.35 =783N. We also need an estimation for rolling resistance, which is probably around 0.2. Now we can find the work necessary to move the vehicle 10km: 10000*156.6 =1,566,000J. We would need 1566000/0.79% =198,227,848.101 J of input, if we assume the 0.79% efficiency. Methane energy density is around 55.5MJ/kg, so we need around 198227848/55500000=3.572kg of methane, which isn’t a lot. In food calories it’s around 198227848/4184 =47,377.593cal, which for my maintenance calories is around 20 days of eating at 2400cal. In order to ensure enough fuel we would probably use the methane stores on Titan, but the bigger challenge is finding oxygen. Either we would bring oxygen to Titan(expensive and unsustainable) or we can produce oxygen through electrolysis through this reaction: 2H2O -> O2 + 2H2. This is a great solution because there’s already ice on the surface of Titan, and Hydrogen can be used as fuel, however we also need energy to start the reaction.

  4. mcrompton Avatar
    mcrompton

    Nice thinking, Trison. I’m not entirely sure how the caloric equivalents relate but the fact that you’ve looked at fueling the vehicle with the materials you will have access to on Titan is a great start! I wonder what the difference in mass will be between an electric motor system and an internal combustion engine…

  5. Ms. Holmen Avatar
    Ms. Holmen

    I wonder a bit at the calculation of your efficiency, since power (current * voltage) and energy aren’t the same thing, so this won’t give you a proper answer. The resistance measurement will also be different if the circuit is closed or open, hence the need to measure current directly instead of calculating. I like how you get into the implications and challenges / opportunities of Titan more thoroughly in the comments – next time, I’d hope to see it in the main post!

Leave a Reply to mcrompton Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *